H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatjana Maria vs Suzan Lamens H2H: 0-1

Suzan Lamens holds a 1–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Suzan Lamens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Suzan Lamens won the 2025 Korea Open first round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Suzan Lamens
The Netherlands Age 27 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Suzan Lamens #64 6-4 6-1 Tatjana Maria #44 Match data Sep 17, 2025 R32 Korea Open WTA 500 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatjana Maria #83 #36 1,320 1,822 164 261 38.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Suzan Lamens #164 #57 1,087 1,752 30 36 45.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatjana Maria Suzan Lamens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,452 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0 2022 1–3 25.0% #200 1,476 0 0
23 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0 2024 10–6 62.5% #87 1,675 0 1
25 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0 2025 19–23 45.2% #89 1,658 0 1
26 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0 2026 0–4 0.0% #164 1,599 0 1
27 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,638 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2026 18–24 42.9% #83 1,794 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatjana Maria Suzan Lamens
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2024 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2025 12 16 28 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2026 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 4 13 17 23.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 152 228 33.3% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5% — 19 21 40 47.5% 7 8 15 46.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/357 of Tatjana Maria's and 52/67 of Suzan Lamens's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatjana Maria Suzan Lamens
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 1.8 8.0 59.1% 61.8% 36.0% 47.7% 41.4% 51.5% 41.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 16/16 2.8 3.7 63.2% 63.0% 45.1% 51.8% 61.4% 56.2% 48.5%
25 2013 2/7 3.5 6.0 58.2% 51.5% 38.5% 58.6% 33.3% 45.9% 32.1% 2025 28/42 1.4 5.2 59.2% 60.5% 41.7% 51.3% 47.1% 52.8% 42.8%
26 2014 5/5 6.4 4.2 50.8% 62.2% 39.2% 46.8% 53.3% 51.2% 41.2% 2026 4/5 2.0 4.8 63.5% 60.4% 39.5% 52.5% 39.6% 52.9% 42.0%
27 2015 23/26 3.2 2.9 54.7% 68.0% 50.1% 58.5% 46.8% 59.8% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 18/19 3.2 2.2 60.4% 59.2% 45.0% 47.9% 47.3% 53.6% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 30/31 3.2 2.2 56.2% 69.6% 44.9% 57.7% 48.4% 58.7% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 34/35 4.0 2.7 56.2% 63.7% 43.5% 50.8% 47.7% 54.5% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 31/32 3.4 2.7 54.1% 63.3% 42.7% 48.7% 43.2% 54.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 7/7 3.6 2.6 60.9% 53.6% 39.4% 47.2% 30.6% 47.8% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 27/29 3.9 3.5 53.3% 71.0% 49.3% 55.7% 50.1% 60.8% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 48/49 3.9 2.9 55.1% 65.7% 44.8% 49.5% 56.1% 56.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 39/41 3.4 2.9 54.9% 60.2% 41.7% 45.7% 40.6% 52.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 15/33 4.7 2.9 57.3% 59.9% 42.1% 43.5% 43.4% 52.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 41/43 4.3 2.3 60.0% 67.0% 44.1% 53.1% 50.2% 57.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320/428 3.8 2.8 56.1% 64.7% 44.4% 51.1% 47.6% 55.8% 41.2% — 52/67 1.9 4.9 60.8% 61.3% 42.1% 51.3% 50.5% 53.8% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatjana Maria Suzan Lamens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1452 109.9 — — — — +12 +66 +133 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1424 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1493 111.4 — — — — -29 +34 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1497 109.5 — — — — -12 -1 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.82 2022 1476 101.2 -2.39 -1.07 0.851 46.5% — +84 — 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–1 — 0.00
23 2011 1469 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16 2023 1451 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -16 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36 2024 1676 122.2 -0.57 +2.94 1.106 52.1% +7 -90 — 61.5% +0.92 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.18
25 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +20 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01 2025 1659 135.5 -2.97 -0.23 0.908 47.9% -1 -73 -113 45.4% -0.46 7–6 (54%) 7–4 (64%) 105.2 -0.63
26 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +20 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29 2026 1599 110.8 +0.01 -1.85 0.890 47.4% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–2 1–0 — -0.34
27 2015 1479 110.7 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -7 -43 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -9 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1632 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -69 -111 +75 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1576 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +21 -40 +207 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1638 120.9 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -65 -154 +320 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.6 +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1795 129.7 +0.55 -0.13 1.009 50.2% -226 -248 +315 44.9% -0.19 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 123.0 -0.64 -1.31 0.932 48.7% -35 -65 +192 40.4% -0.69 44–69 (39%) 44–49 (47%) 97.2 +0.96 — 1752 126.1 -1.96 +0.56 0.960 49.1% +1 -46 -113 46.8% -0.25 11–13 (46%) 9–6 (60%) 103.4 -1.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.