H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Tatjana Maria vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 0-1

Sybille Bammer holds a 1–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2008 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 4-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sybille Bammer #24 4-6 6-2 7-5 Tatjana Maria #242 Match data Oct 2, 2008* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatjana Maria #70 #36 1,320 1,822 164 262 38.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Sybille Bammer — #19 2,014 1,845 133 141 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatjana Maria Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,447 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,420 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0
26 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0
27 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0 2007 43–25 63.2% #19 1,780 0 1
28 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1
29 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2
30 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,649 0 2
31 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1 2011 3–9 25.0% — 1,570 0 2
32 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,637 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2026 18–25 41.9% #70 1,792 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatjana Maria Sybille Bammer
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2007 29 17 46 63.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 4 14 18 22.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 153 229 33.2% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5% — 94 98 192 49.0% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 321/357 of Tatjana Maria's and 198/267 of Sybille Bammer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatjana Maria Sybille Bammer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 2013 2/7 3.5 6.0 58.2% 51.5% 38.5% 58.6% 33.3% 45.9% 32.1% 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3%
26 2014 5/5 6.4 4.2 50.8% 62.2% 39.2% 46.8% 53.3% 51.2% 41.2% 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8%
27 2015 23/26 3.2 2.9 54.7% 68.0% 50.1% 58.5% 46.8% 59.8% 39.4% 2007 56/68 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2%
28 2016 18/19 3.2 2.2 60.4% 59.2% 45.0% 47.9% 47.3% 53.6% 38.9% 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0%
29 2017 30/31 3.2 2.2 56.2% 69.6% 44.9% 57.7% 48.4% 58.7% 42.3% 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1%
30 2018 34/35 4.0 2.7 56.2% 63.7% 43.5% 50.8% 47.7% 54.5% 38.2% 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5%
31 2019 31/32 3.4 2.7 54.1% 63.3% 42.7% 48.7% 43.2% 54.0% 39.1% 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0%
32 2020 7/7 3.6 2.6 60.9% 53.6% 39.4% 47.2% 30.6% 47.8% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 27/29 3.9 3.5 53.3% 71.0% 49.3% 55.7% 50.1% 60.8% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 48/49 3.9 2.9 55.1% 65.7% 44.8% 49.5% 56.1% 56.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 39/41 3.4 2.9 54.9% 60.2% 41.7% 45.7% 40.6% 52.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 15/33 4.7 2.9 57.3% 59.9% 42.1% 43.5% 43.4% 52.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 42/43 4.3 2.3 59.9% 67.0% 44.2% 53.2% 49.5% 57.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 321/428 3.8 2.8 56.1% 64.7% 44.4% 51.1% 47.5% 55.8% 41.2% — 198/274 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatjana Maria Sybille Bammer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1448 107.7 — — — — +9 +71 +139 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1420 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.48 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
21 2009 1491 111.6 — — — — -29 +37 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1497 109.6 — — — — -13 0 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1469 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17
24 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -17 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03
25 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +19 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20
26 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +19 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24
27 2015 1479 110.8 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -8 -42 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +0.67 2007 1780 148.4 +3.79 +3.03 1.182 53.4% -40 -62 -94 62.9% +0.93 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.08
28 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -10 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.7 +4.05
29 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89 2009 1672 130.5 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -61 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.50
30 2018 1633 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -70 -112 +74 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09 2010 1649 124.4 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -15 -62 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29
31 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64 2011 1571 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +73 +17 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29
32 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1577 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +20 -41 +206 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1637 120.9 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -64 -153 +316 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.5 +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1793 130.7 +0.60 -0.27 1.007 50.2% -235 -206 +307 44.6% -0.25 1–7 (13%) 4–4 (50%) 96.5 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 123.0 -0.63 -1.33 0.932 48.7% -37 -60 +190 40.4% -0.69 44–70 (39%) 45–49 (48%) 97.5 +0.92 — 1845 135.5 +0.08 +0.68 0.994 49.8% 0 -21 -53 49.8% -0.09 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.2 +1.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.