H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Tatjana Maria vs Vera Zvonareva
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tatjana Maria vs Vera Zvonareva.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | #76 | #41 | 1,320 | 1,810 | 164 | 254 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Vera Zvonareva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #89 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #223 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2010 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #268 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2015 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2018 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #72 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | 2022 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #68 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | 2023 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #54 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | 2024 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | 2025 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #45 | 1,638 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | 2026 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 |