H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Terry Holladay vs Elna Reinach H2H: 0-1
Elna Reinach holds a 1–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1986 Berkeley fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1986* | Berkeley | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elna Reinach | (w/o) | Terry Holladay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Terry Holladay | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |