H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Terry Holladay vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-2

Nancy Richey holds a 2–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1976 Houston round of 16 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Terry Holladay
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Nancy Richey
USA Age 84 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Richey 6-0 6-3 Terry Holladay Match data Jan 16, 1976* R16 Houston WTA 250 Hard
Nancy Richey 6-3 6-2 Terry Holladay Match data Sep 26, 1974* R32 Denver WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Terry Holladay #395 #39 7 1,942 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nancy Richey — #8 — 2,245 324 109 74.8% 1 0 0 2 19 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Terry Holladay Nancy Richey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1973 4–2 66.7% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1974 12–17 41.4% — 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1975 32–23 58.2% — 1,758 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1976 28–20 58.3% — 1,880 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1977 15–15 50.0% — 1,935 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1978 2–8 20.0% — 1,860 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1979 17–18 48.6% — 1,829 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1980 25–21 54.3% — 1,825 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,672 0 1 1968 56–5 91.8% — 1,916 1 4
26 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,638 0 1 1969 33–8 80.5% — 2,054 1 7
27 1983 9–8 52.9% — 1,678 0 1 1970 43–8 84.3% — 2,122 1 14
28 1984 15–16 48.4% #50 1,676 0 1 1971 29–13 69.0% — 2,076 1 14
29 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,608 0 1 1972 45–12 78.9% — 2,194 1 19
30 1986 5–8 38.5% #103 1,627 0 1 1973 34–13 72.3% — 2,191 1 19
31 1987 0–9 0.0% #315 1,511 0 1 1974 25–13 65.8% — 2,151 1 19
32 — — — — — — — 1975 24–11 68.6% #8 2,120 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 1976 14–10 58.3% — 2,084 1 20
34 — — — — — — — 1977 15–7 68.2% — 2,016 1 22
35 — — — — — — — 1978 6–9 40.0% — 1,922 1 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Terry Holladay Nancy Richey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1972 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1973 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1979 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 12 23 47.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1968 5 1 6 83.3% 35 3 38 92.1% 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
26 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1969 15 4 19 78.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
27 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1970 9 0 9 100.0% 26 5 31 83.9% 4 1 5 80.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 1984 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1971 8 4 12 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
29 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1972 11 1 12 91.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 3 16 81.3%
30 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1973 12 3 15 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
31 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5%
Career — 64 69 133 48.1% 23 27 50 46.0% 42 39 81 51.9% 50 64 114 43.9% — 87 29 116 75.0% 125 34 159 78.6% 38 11 49 77.6% 65 35 100 65.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Terry Holladay Nancy Richey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1970 1489 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1972 1473 99.7 — — — — +72 — — 45.5% -0.27 0–1 0–1 — +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1973 1507 105.7 — — — — +97 — — 66.7% +1.08 — 1–0 — +1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1974 1564 120.1 — — — — -36 +43 — 44.6% -0.46 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1975 1759 130.6 — — — — -20 -115 -113 57.1% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 +3.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1976 1881 145.1 — — — — +18 -233 -149 59.2% +0.31 4–4 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1977 1935 148.1 — — — — -11 — -129 51.5% +0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -5.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1978 1860 129.1 — — — — -14 — -55 37.5% -0.92 1–5 (17%) 1–3 (25%) 94.1 -1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1979 1830 140.2 — — — — -3 — — 49.3% +0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 1825 148.0 — — — — +8 — -5 52.0% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -3.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 1672 108.6 — — — — +73 — +82 30.3% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.08 1968 1916 145.6 — — — — -119 +83 -174 87.6% +3.09 10–1 (91%) — — -0.10
26 1982 1638 94.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 1969 2054 151.8 — — — — +32 -32 -127 77.3% +1.99 6–2 (75%) — — -3.41
27 1983 1679 131.8 — — — — +14 — +103 57.1% +0.28 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.24 1970 2123 162.9 — — — — +60 -35 -127 80.0% +2.51 6–2 (75%) 1–0 — -4.02
28 1984 1677 119.7 — — — — +9 — +71 46.8% -0.44 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 100.8 +1.76 1971 2077 156.0 — — — — +22 +31 -94 65.1% +1.50 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 -3.59
29 1985 1608 118.7 — — — — +24 — +88 40.7% -0.75 4–5 (44%) 1–5 (17%) 98.1 +0.50 1972 2194 166.6 — — — — +186 -41 -224 79.6% +2.43 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.6 -6.67
30 1986 1628 114.8 — — — — -6 — +92 40.7% -0.70 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 +0.25 1973 2192 164.0 — — — — +123 -6 -220 67.6% +1.24 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.3 -7.33
31 1987 1511 88.0 — — — — +46 — +95 5.3% -3.53 0–1 0–1 — +0.19 1974 2152 156.5 — — — — +112 +19 -165 68.9% +1.60 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 -3.90
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2121 155.3 — — — — +105 -19 — 65.8% +1.55 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 96.2 -2.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 2085 155.1 — — — — +132 -40 — 60.0% +0.82 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -4.18
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2016 146.8 — — — — +91 +43 — 64.6% +1.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1923 136.5 — — — — +56 +55 — 45.5% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -2.03
Career — 1943 138.0 — — — — +8 -60 -15 48.8% -0.14 51–55 (48%) 33–39 (46%) 98.9 -0.75 — 2245 164.5 — — — — +89 +9 -154 72.7% +1.89 62–37 (63%) 26–26 (50%) 100.3 -9.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.