H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Terry Holladay vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-2
Nancy Richey holds a 2–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1976 Houston fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1976* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-0 6-3 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1974* | Denver | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-2 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Terry Holladay | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |