H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Terry Holladay vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 2-1
Terry Holladay holds a 2–1 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Terry Holladay leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Terry Holladay won the 1983 Newport quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1983* | Newport | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Terry Holladay | 6-4 6-2 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1973* | Los Angeles Pac Southwest | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Terry Holladay | 6-4 7-6 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1972* | Los Angeles Pac Southwest | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tina Mochizuki | 1-6 7-6 6-2 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Terry Holladay | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |