H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Timea Babos vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 1-0

Timea Babos holds a 1–0 lead over Aleksandra Krunic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Timea Babos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Timea Babos won the 2013 Budapest round of 32 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Babos
Hungary Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Aleksandra Krunic
Serbia Age 33 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aleksandra Krunic #318 7-6(7) 3-6 6-4 Timea Babos #250 Match data Aug 17, 2024 Q1 Q Monterrey Open WTA 500 Hard
Timea Babos #115 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 Aleksandra Krunic #148 Match data Jul 11, 2013* R32 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Timea Babos #451 #25 1,675 1,758 124 180 40.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Aleksandra Krunic #470 #39 1,210 1,771 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Babos Aleksandra Krunic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0 2011 2–2 50.0% #223 1,504 0 0
19 2012 14–15 48.3% #67 1,564 0 1 2012 2–1 66.7% #165 1,525 0 0
20 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,544 0 1 2013 0–4 0.0% #151 1,463 0 0
21 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,484 0 1 2014 5–6 45.5% #87 1,523 0 0
22 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,563 0 1 2015 12–19 38.7% #108 1,543 0 0
23 2016 35–28 55.6% #28 1,707 0 1 2016 4–12 25.0% #144 1,595 0 0
24 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,639 0 2 2017 20–13 60.6% #54 1,753 0 1
25 2018 19–24 44.2% #59 1,609 0 3 2018 20–23 46.5% #55 1,713 0 2
26 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,594 0 3 2019 5–14 26.3% #163 1,556 0 2
27 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,540 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,495 0 3 2021 6–6 50.0% #128 1,643 0 2
29 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,454 0 3 2022 9–10 47.4% #115 1,635 0 2
30 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,450 0 3 2024 2–7 22.2% #286 1,603 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2025 0–3 0.0% #468 1,565 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Timea Babos Aleksandra Krunic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2012 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2014 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2016 25 19 44 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2017 19 17 36 52.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — —
25 2018 17 16 33 51.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 8 15 23 34.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
Career — 90 113 203 44.3% 25 45 70 35.7% 9 22 31 29.0% — 41 69 110 37.3% 33 39 72 45.8% 13 12 25 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/304 of Timea Babos's and 187/204 of Aleksandra Krunic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Timea Babos Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 57.1% 61.1% 37.0% 50.0% 16.7% 50.8% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 2/2 2.5 2.5 60.9% 71.5% 44.6% 50.0% 51.0% 61.3% 43.0% 2011 2/4 3.0 1.0 64.4% 78.7% 70.1% 50.0% 58.3% 75.8% 52.6%
19 2012 26/29 5.0 4.3 60.5% 65.8% 43.9% 52.1% 43.9% 57.0% 41.9% 2012 3/3 2.0 6.3 48.1% 63.1% 40.4% 51.5% 68.5% 51.0% 50.8%
20 2013 24/25 4.5 3.8 57.6% 62.5% 43.5% 48.6% 46.0% 54.5% 39.3% 2013 4/4 1.3 4.5 48.9% 59.7% 50.2% 45.6% 42.5% 54.7% 42.6%
21 2014 13/15 5.7 4.2 60.5% 65.3% 43.7% 57.7% 37.2% 56.8% 38.9% 2014 9/11 3.2 4.1 56.7% 64.0% 45.1% 44.4% 49.5% 55.7% 39.9%
22 2015 25/33 3.3 3.3 67.1% 62.8% 48.2% 50.8% 42.4% 57.7% 38.1% 2015 23/31 2.6 2.6 57.1% 60.9% 48.4% 49.1% 45.7% 54.9% 37.5%
23 2016 57/63 4.5 3.6 62.3% 66.7% 46.0% 50.8% 46.3% 58.9% 43.2% 2016 15/16 1.3 2.3 63.0% 58.0% 43.8% 35.6% 38.2% 52.8% 42.1%
24 2017 46/46 4.6 3.5 62.3% 68.8% 43.7% 54.7% 49.3% 59.4% 40.0% 2017 32/33 2.2 1.9 63.6% 64.5% 50.3% 51.1% 51.6% 59.5% 48.5%
25 2018 42/43 4.4 4.0 60.0% 68.8% 46.8% 57.6% 44.3% 60.0% 41.8% 2018 40/43 1.6 2.2 63.4% 61.4% 49.2% 52.9% 39.9% 56.5% 43.2%
26 2019 22/22 3.9 4.5 58.6% 64.9% 40.5% 59.3% 38.6% 54.7% 37.9% 2019 19/19 1.1 2.1 63.0% 56.1% 47.8% 53.8% 36.9% 52.9% 39.4%
27 2020 6/6 1.0 3.5 59.2% 63.9% 42.1% 38.2% 45.8% 54.9% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 12/12 4.3 4.3 55.0% 61.9% 39.8% 45.9% 48.4% 52.3% 37.6% 2021 12/12 2.0 1.5 57.1% 64.4% 50.9% 42.3% 67.7% 58.8% 44.0%
29 2022 1/1 3.0 4.0 60.6% 55.0% 46.2% 60.0% 25.0% 51.5% 38.6% 2022 19/19 1.8 2.7 58.8% 62.4% 50.4% 58.2% 48.6% 57.7% 44.1%
30 2023 4/4 1.8 4.3 62.9% 60.5% 40.4% 53.2% 74.6% 52.8% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 2/2 9.0 3.5 57.7% 62.3% 54.4% 77.3% 19.6% 59.0% 34.4% 2024 9/9 1.8 2.6 61.6% 55.9% 46.5% 47.2% 47.4% 52.4% 40.9%
Career — 283/304 4.3 3.8 61.0% 66.0% 44.6% 53.1% 45.0% 57.6% 40.4% — 187/207 1.9 2.4 60.8% 61.4% 48.7% 49.8% 46.4% 56.3% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Timea Babos Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2010 1491 99.7 +0.22 -2.30 0.677 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1503 104.3 +0.80 +0.51 1.109 51.4% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11 2011 1504 105.6 +1.42 +0.02 2.172 63.5% — — — 33.3% +0.33 — — — +0.40
19 2012 1564 115.8 +1.04 -1.36 0.976 49.4% +20 -33 +62 49.3% -0.38 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 101.9 +0.38 2012 1526 101.6 -1.43 +0.94 1.036 51.0% +12 — — 62.5% +1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.27
20 2013 1544 111.1 -0.34 -3.76 0.862 46.9% +14 +4 — 38.6% -0.95 5–4 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.2 -0.12 2013 1463 96.7 -1.74 -1.39 0.941 48.2% +24 — — 27.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.48
21 2014 1484 110.0 -0.66 -2.53 0.902 47.8% -2 — +90 40.0% -0.17 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 91.7 +0.74 2014 1524 119.6 -0.18 -0.41 0.902 48.4% +2 — — 46.2% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.31
22 2015 1563 124.4 +0.04 -1.97 0.900 47.9% -39 -34 +34 38.2% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 99.5 -2.03 2015 1543 109.3 -2.03 -3.19 0.832 46.3% -35 -23 +122 40.0% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.3 +0.06
23 2016 1708 138.3 +2.77 +0.15 1.051 51.1% -28 -88 -104 53.8% +0.53 11–9 (55%) 7–12 (37%) 101.7 -0.26 2016 1595 118.6 -1.15 -1.51 0.893 47.6% -54 +15 +43 27.3% -1.30 0–1 1–1 — -1.00
24 2017 1639 130.8 +1.85 -2.67 0.986 49.9% +63 -67 -124 48.6% -0.01 6–13 (32%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 +1.56 2017 1753 130.9 +2.13 +3.51 1.197 53.9% -68 +21 — 59.2% +0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.88
25 2018 1610 134.0 +2.55 -1.23 1.046 50.9% +53 -69 -106 50.0% +0.25 3–11 (21%) 3–7 (30%) 88.6 +0.06 2018 1714 131.0 -0.44 -0.20 0.992 49.5% -69 +26 +49 44.3% -0.43 8–5 (62%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 -0.57
26 2019 1595 114.5 -1.44 -4.46 0.838 46.6% +29 -87 — 35.4% -1.15 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 +0.77 2019 1557 107.2 -2.43 -3.32 0.836 46.4% -17 +146 — 27.5% -1.58 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.16
27 2020 1540 108.8 +0.56 -3.13 0.694 43.3% +28 — — 7.7% -2.85 0–1 1–0 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 1496 105.1 -3.04 -3.61 0.789 45.0% +56 -88 — 29.2% -1.79 1–1 2–0 — +0.01 2021 1644 126.9 +1.13 +0.71 1.067 51.3% -4 +67 — 43.5% +0.17 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04
29 2022 1454 101.3 +1.41 -1.79 0.796 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 2022 1635 120.3 +0.48 +1.43 1.042 50.8% -31 +63 +22 48.8% -0.05 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.11
30 2023 1481 113.2 -0.36 -1.04 0.905 48.0% — -15 — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.04 2023 1633 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1451 103.6 -0.62 +0.09 0.841 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–2 — +0.13 2024 1604 109.4 -1.80 -1.53 0.858 46.5% -21 — +83 30.4% -1.48 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.04
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 106.9 — — — — — +73 — 25.0% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.70
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1551 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1758 128.1 +1.05 -1.91 0.952 49.0% +18 -54 -13 44.6% -0.28 38–68 (36%) 39–50 (44%) 90.6 +0.30 — 1772 124.4 -0.34 -0.21 0.983 49.6% -39 +40 +64 42.5% -0.51 23–30 (43%) 18–19 (49%) 97.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.