H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Timea Babos vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 0-1
Irina Falconi Hartman holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Irina Falconi Hartman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Irina Falconi Hartman won the 2012 Birmingham third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2012* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Irina Falconi Hartman | 6-0 6-4 | Timea Babos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Timea Babos | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |