H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Timea Babos vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 1-1

Timea Babos and Kiki Bertens are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Timea Babos won the 2016 Italian Open first round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Babos
Hungary Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Timea Babos #48 6-1 6-4 Kiki Bertens #86 Match data May 11, 2016* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Kiki Bertens #41 7-5 6-2 Timea Babos #114 Match data Apr 25, 2013* R32 Marrakech International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Timea Babos #451 #25 1,675 1,758 124 180 40.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,004 216 172 55.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Babos Kiki Bertens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 14–15 48.3% #67 1,564 0 1 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0
20 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,544 0 1 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,580 0 1
21 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,484 0 1 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,551 0 1
22 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,563 0 1 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,579 0 1
23 2016 35–28 55.6% #28 1,707 0 1 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1
24 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,639 0 2 2016 26–20 56.5% #22 1,689 0 2
25 2018 19–24 44.2% #59 1,609 0 3 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,696 0 5
26 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,594 0 3 2018 46–23 66.7% #9 1,911 0 8
27 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,540 0 3 2019 57–26 68.7% #9 1,897 0 10
28 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,495 0 3 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,882 0 11
29 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,454 0 3 2021 1–8 11.1% #25 1,733 0 11
30 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,450 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Timea Babos Kiki Bertens
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2014 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
22 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2016 25 19 44 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2017 19 17 36 52.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2016 7 14 21 33.3% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2018 17 16 33 51.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 7 16 23 30.4% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 26 15 41 63.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 30 18 48 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
28 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 10 3 13 76.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 113 203 44.3% 25 45 70 35.7% 9 22 31 29.0% — — — — — 98 107 205 47.8% 95 45 140 67.9% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 1 4 75.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/304 of Timea Babos's and 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Timea Babos Kiki Bertens
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 57.1% 61.1% 37.0% 50.0% 16.7% 50.8% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 2/2 2.5 2.5 60.9% 71.5% 44.6% 50.0% 51.0% 61.3% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 26/29 5.0 4.3 60.5% 65.8% 43.9% 52.1% 43.9% 57.0% 41.9% 2011 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.7% 61.1% 32.3% 50.0% 42.9% 47.8% 40.9%
20 2013 24/25 4.5 3.8 57.6% 62.5% 43.5% 48.6% 46.0% 54.5% 39.3% 2012 23/23 2.9 4.1 60.5% 65.3% 41.1% 49.3% 48.2% 55.7% 42.3%
21 2014 13/15 5.7 4.2 60.5% 65.3% 43.7% 57.7% 37.2% 56.8% 38.9% 2013 30/33 2.2 5.5 57.6% 61.8% 42.9% 51.9% 45.5% 54.1% 43.7%
22 2015 25/33 3.3 3.3 67.1% 62.8% 48.2% 50.8% 42.4% 57.7% 38.1% 2014 22/25 2.7 4.0 58.1% 60.8% 44.5% 49.6% 41.8% 53.8% 45.8%
23 2016 57/63 4.5 3.6 62.3% 66.7% 46.0% 50.8% 46.3% 58.9% 43.2% 2015 19/24 1.9 5.1 63.9% 59.1% 51.6% 53.8% 57.3% 56.1% 36.8%
24 2017 46/46 4.6 3.5 62.3% 68.8% 43.7% 54.7% 49.3% 59.4% 40.0% 2016 45/46 3.8 3.4 60.1% 67.4% 47.6% 55.6% 44.9% 59.0% 46.0%
25 2018 42/43 4.4 4.0 60.0% 68.8% 46.8% 57.6% 44.3% 60.0% 41.8% 2017 54/56 4.5 4.4 55.5% 71.4% 43.7% 54.1% 50.0% 59.1% 45.9%
26 2019 22/22 3.9 4.5 58.6% 64.9% 40.5% 59.3% 38.6% 54.7% 37.9% 2018 64/69 4.8 4.0 58.0% 69.1% 47.9% 51.8% 51.7% 60.0% 46.8%
27 2020 6/6 1.0 3.5 59.2% 63.9% 42.1% 38.2% 45.8% 54.9% 31.3% 2019 76/83 5.6 4.4 57.1% 72.6% 47.2% 58.5% 48.8% 61.8% 43.6%
28 2021 12/12 4.3 4.3 55.0% 61.9% 39.8% 45.9% 48.4% 52.3% 37.6% 2020 19/19 4.2 3.8 63.7% 68.3% 43.5% 59.6% 57.0% 59.1% 47.0%
29 2022 1/1 3.0 4.0 60.6% 55.0% 46.2% 60.0% 25.0% 51.5% 38.6% 2021 8/9 1.5 4.8 64.5% 58.8% 40.4% 44.2% 43.1% 51.9% 37.9%
30 2023 4/4 1.8 4.3 62.9% 60.5% 40.4% 53.2% 74.6% 52.8% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 2/2 9.0 3.5 57.7% 62.3% 54.4% 77.3% 19.6% 59.0% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 283/304 4.3 3.8 61.0% 66.0% 44.6% 53.1% 45.0% 57.6% 40.4% — 361/388 4.0 4.3 58.6% 67.8% 45.8% 54.1% 49.0% 58.5% 44.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Timea Babos Kiki Bertens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2010 1491 99.7 +0.22 -2.30 0.677 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1503 104.3 +0.80 +0.51 1.109 51.4% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1564 115.8 +1.04 -1.36 0.976 49.4% +20 -33 +62 49.3% -0.38 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 101.9 +0.38 2011 1494 97.6 +1.77 -1.03 0.783 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.13
20 2013 1544 111.1 -0.34 -3.76 0.862 46.9% +14 +4 — 38.6% -0.95 5–4 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.2 -0.12 2012 1580 118.0 +0.05 -1.16 0.955 49.1% -24 +11 +4 47.1% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.6 -0.87
21 2014 1484 110.0 -0.66 -2.53 0.902 47.8% -2 — +90 40.0% -0.17 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 91.7 +0.74 2013 1551 121.8 -1.34 -0.74 0.952 48.8% +33 +22 — 44.6% -0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.04
22 2015 1563 124.4 +0.04 -1.97 0.900 47.9% -39 -34 +34 38.2% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 99.5 -2.03 2014 1580 124.4 -1.78 +0.96 0.993 49.7% -23 +77 — 47.2% -0.02 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.24
23 2016 1708 138.3 +2.77 +0.15 1.051 51.1% -28 -88 -104 53.8% +0.53 11–9 (55%) 7–12 (37%) 101.7 -0.26 2015 1520 114.8 -1.77 -2.92 0.837 46.5% -52 +93 +82 34.5% -1.07 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 95.7 -1.23
24 2017 1639 130.8 +1.85 -2.67 0.986 49.9% +63 -67 -124 48.6% -0.01 6–13 (32%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 +1.56 2016 1689 132.6 +2.91 +1.95 1.122 52.4% -129 +137 -72 54.6% +0.61 6–5 (55%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.68
25 2018 1610 134.0 +2.55 -1.23 1.046 50.9% +53 -69 -106 50.0% +0.25 3–11 (21%) 3–7 (30%) 88.6 +0.06 2017 1696 135.9 +2.41 +1.24 1.122 52.6% -173 +308 -130 54.9% +0.68 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +1.57
26 2019 1595 114.5 -1.44 -4.46 0.838 46.6% +29 -87 — 35.4% -1.15 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 +0.77 2018 1911 154.4 +3.14 +4.20 1.171 53.3% -97 +80 -217 63.3% +1.14 14–12 (54%) 10–15 (40%) 100.3 -1.83
27 2020 1540 108.8 +0.56 -3.13 0.694 43.3% +28 — — 7.7% -2.85 0–1 1–0 — -0.09 2019 1897 153.7 +4.80 +1.58 1.142 52.4% -14 +155 -90 65.1% +0.95 18–13 (58%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 +0.54
28 2021 1496 105.1 -3.04 -3.61 0.789 45.0% +56 -88 — 29.2% -1.79 1–1 2–0 — +0.01 2020 1883 144.7 +1.90 +2.64 1.150 53.1% +54 +91 — 65.1% +1.09 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +1.01
29 2022 1454 101.3 +1.41 -1.79 0.796 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 2021 1733 102.2 -2.11 -1.63 0.787 44.9% +114 +208 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.66
30 2023 1481 113.2 -0.36 -1.04 0.905 48.0% — -15 — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1451 103.6 -0.62 +0.09 0.841 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–2 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1758 128.1 +1.05 -1.91 0.952 49.0% +18 -54 -13 44.6% -0.28 38–68 (36%) 39–50 (44%) 90.6 +0.30 — 2004 143.8 +2.04 +1.38 1.074 51.4% -53 +144 -88 55.1% +0.46 62–63 (50%) 46–50 (48%) 100.2 -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.