H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Timea Babos vs Mona Barthel H2H: 2-3
Mona Barthel holds a 3–2 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mona Barthel leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Timea Babos won the 2018 Miami first round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2018* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Timea Babos | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2018* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Timea Babos | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2015* | Marrakech | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Timea Babos | 6-4 6-0 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2015* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Mona Barthel | 6-3 6-3 | Timea Babos | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2012* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | Timea Babos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Timea Babos | Mona Barthel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 |