H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Timea Babos vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 1-2
Pauline Parmentier holds a 2–1 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pauline Parmentier leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Timea Babos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2019 Tashkent fourth round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2019* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Pauline Parmentier | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Timea Babos | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Pauline Parmentier | 6-7(1) 6-2 6-0 | Timea Babos | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2016* | Rabat | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Timea Babos | 6-3 6-3 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Timea Babos | Pauline Parmentier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |