H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Timea Babos vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-0

Timea Babos holds a 1–0 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Timea Babos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Timea Babos won the 2016 Rome third round 6-7(5) 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Babos
HUN Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 12, 2016* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Timea Babos #48 6-7(5) 7-5 6-4 Venus Williams #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Timea Babos #453 #25 1,675 1,768 123 177 41.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Babos Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2012 13–14 48.1% #67 1,553 0 1 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,540 0 1 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,482 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,564 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2016 35–27 56.5% #28 1,712 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,637 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2018 19–23 45.2% #59 1,614 0 3 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,595 0 3 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,542 0 3 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,497 0 3 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,455 0 3 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,451 0 3 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47