H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tina Krizan vs Li Ling Chen H2H: 0-1

Li Ling Chen holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Krizan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Li Ling Chen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Li Ling Chen won the 1996 China Open round of 32 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tina Krizan
SLO Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Li Ling Chen
CHN Age 55 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Li Ling Chen 6-4 7-6 Tina Krizan #151 Match data Oct 17, 1996* R32 China Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Krizan #469 #95 204 1,577 17 38 30.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Li Ling Chen — — — 1,601 9 11 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tina Krizan Li Ling Chen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 0–3 0.0% #153 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1994 3–3 50.0% #121 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1995 9–13 40.9% #127 1,532 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
22 1996 3–8 27.3% #147 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0
24 1998 1–3 25.0% #141 1,487 0 0 1995 4–4 50.0% — 1,524 0 0
25 1999 1–5 16.7% #145 1,458 0 0 1996 4–4 50.0% — 1,576 0 0
26 2000 0–3 0.0% #209 1,428 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,565 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tina Krizan Li Ling Chen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1995 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10 17 27 37.0% 2 12 14 14.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tina Krizan Li Ling Chen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1469 98.1 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.25 0–2 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1509 106.2 — — — — +27 — +82 42.9% 0.00 2–0 0–2 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1533 112.2 — — — — +41 -32 +19 41.7% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — -0.56 1992 1499 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.16
22 1996 1495 106.5 — — — — +40 — — 29.2% -1.54 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1508 106.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.06
24 1998 1487 107.6 — — — — — -21 — 25.0% -1.25 — 0–1 — -0.07 1995 1524 102.0 — — — — +26 — — 47.1% -0.06 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.60
25 1999 1458 110.3 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.14 1996 1576 125.1 — — — — +23 — — 50.0% -0.39 1–1 1–1 — -0.17
26 2000 1428 99.9 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.75 0–2 — — -0.06 1997 1565 103.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.02
Career — 1577 111.6 — — — — +41 -28 +46 34.7% -1.15 5–9 (36%) 5–7 (42%) 98.4 -0.55 — 1601 116.7 — — — — +25 — — 45.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +1.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.