H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tina Krizan vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 2-1
Tina Krizan holds a 2–1 lead over Meredith Mcgrath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Tina Krizan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meredith Mcgrath won the 1996 Birmingham third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1996* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Meredith Mcgrath | 6-3 6-3 | Tina Krizan | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tina Krizan | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Meredith Mcgrath | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1994* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Tina Krizan | 6-4 6-3 | Meredith Mcgrath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Krizan | #469 | #95 | 204 | 1,577 | 17 | 38 | 30.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Meredith Mcgrath | #315 | #18 | 898 | 1,927 | 90 | 84 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tina Krizan | Meredith Mcgrath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #127 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #780 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #147 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #62 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #26 | 1,917 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |