H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tina Krizan vs Nancy Feber H2H: 0-1

Nancy Feber holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Krizan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nancy Feber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nancy Feber won the 1995 Roland Garros round of 128 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tina Krizan
SLO Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Feber #121 6-2 7-5 Tina Krizan #101 Match data May 31, 1995* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Krizan #469 #95 204 1,577 17 38 30.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tina Krizan Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1992 0–3 0.0% #153 1,468 0 0 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1994 3–3 50.0% #121 1,508 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1995 9–13 40.9% #127 1,532 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1996 3–8 27.3% #147 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1998 1–3 25.0% #141 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1999 1–5 16.7% #145 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2000 0–3 0.0% #209 1,428 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tina Krizan Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10 17 27 37.0% 2 12 14 14.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tina Krizan Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1992 1469 98.1 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.25 0–2 1–0 — -0.01 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1994 1509 106.2 — — — — +27 — +82 42.9% 0.00 2–0 0–2 — -0.04 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1995 1533 112.2 — — — — +41 -32 +19 41.7% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — -0.56 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
22 1996 1495 106.5 — — — — +40 — — 29.2% -1.54 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 1487 107.6 — — — — — -21 — 25.0% -1.25 — 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1458 110.3 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 1428 99.9 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.75 0–2 — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1577 111.6 — — — — +41 -28 +46 34.7% -1.15 5–9 (36%) 5–7 (42%) 98.4 -0.55 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.