Tina Lyman
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tory Ann Fretz | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 22, 1968 | H2H |
| Kristy Pigeon | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 3, 1969 | H2H |
| Patti Hogan | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 28, 1968 | H2H |
| Patricia Walkden | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 1, 1970 | H2H |
| Pixie Lamm | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 4, 1969 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Tina Lyman vs Emilie Burrer H2H: 0-1
Emilie Burrer holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Lyman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilie Burrer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Emilie Burrer won the 1968 Locust Valley round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Burrer | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Tina Lyman | Match data | Aug 8, 1968* | R32 | Locust Valley | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Lyman | — | — | — | 1,586 | 12 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emilie Burrer | — | — | — | 1,617 | 25 | 24 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tina Lyman | Emilie Burrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Tina Lyman | Emilie Burrer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1968 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | — | — | — | — | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1969 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1970 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | — | — | — | — | Career | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Tina Lyman | Emilie Burrer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1968 | 1534 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | -16 | 55.3% | +0.70 | 1–4 (20%) | — | — | -0.29 | 1968 | 1592 | 114.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -104 | +64 | 52.8% | +0.26 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | -1.05 |
| 1969 | 1541 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — | -0.05 | 1969 | 1617 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | -125 | -53 | +45 | 50.0% | -0.02 | 2–2 (50%) | — | — | +0.30 |
| 1970 | 1537 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1586 | 111.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | -16 | 52.8% | +0.53 | 1–4 (20%) | — | — | -2.42 | Career | 1618 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | -125 | -81 | +57 | 51.4% | +0.12 | 3–4 (43%) | — | — | -1.53 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Emilie Burrer
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 4, 1969 | H2H |
| Cecilia Martinez | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 20, 1969 | H2H |
| Margaret Court | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 4, 1969 | H2H |
| Kerry Harris | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 30, 1969 | H2H |
| Lesley Turner | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 19, 1969 | H2H |