H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tina Mochizuki vs Dianne Van Rensburg H2H: 0-1

Dianne Van Rensburg holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dianne Van Rensburg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dianne Van Rensburg won the 1986 Tulsa quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tina Mochizuki
USA Age 73
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Dianne Van Rensburg
RSA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dianne Van Rensburg 6-2 6-3 Tina Mochizuki Match data Sep 27, 1986* QF Tulsa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Mochizuki — — — 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Dianne Van Rensburg — — — 1,790 82 92 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tina Mochizuki Dianne Van Rensburg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,424 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,445 0 0 1986 10–8 55.6% — 1,642 0 0
19 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,432 0 0 1987 11–19 36.7% — 1,597 0 0
20 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,463 0 0 1988 17–19 47.2% — 1,699 0 0
21 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,452 0 0 1989 15–20 42.9% — 1,652 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1990 23–16 59.0% — 1,769 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,747 0 1
25 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 1993 3–4 42.9% — 1,731 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1994 3–4 42.9% — 1,696 0 1
27 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,552 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% — 1,672 0 1
28 1981 13–7 65.0% — 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1982 6–3 66.7% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1983 11–13 45.8% — 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1984 5–17 22.7% — 1,454 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1985 5–12 29.4% — 1,475 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1986 11–19 36.7% — 1,521 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1987 8–25 24.2% — 1,455 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 1988 2–11 15.4% — 1,411 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tina Mochizuki Dianne Van Rensburg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 9 8 17 52.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 10 10 20 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 18 8 26 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1980 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4% — 53 45 98 54.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 14 19 33 42.4% 6 11 17 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tina Mochizuki Dianne Van Rensburg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1450 94.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1425 82.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.75 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 1446 105.4 — — — — — +83 — 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.16 1986 1643 122.2 — — — — +3 — -6 51.1% -0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.4 +0.16
19 1972 1432 89.9 — — — — +20 +60 — 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 — +1.65 1987 1598 114.7 — — — — +12 -97 +48 37.7% -1.01 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.96
20 1973 1464 107.3 — — — — +59 — — 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1988 1699 135.4 — — — — -38 -169 -16 50.6% +0.06 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 -1.73
21 1974 1453 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16 1989 1653 133.1 — — — — +20 -138 +24 46.8% -0.52 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 93.7 -0.34
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1770 142.6 — — — — +68 -265 -94 56.0% +0.38 8–5 (62%) 6–6 (50%) 104.0 -0.17
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1748 96.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.14
25 1978 1438 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 1993 1731 115.9 — — — — +47 — — 43.8% -0.81 1–1 2–0 — -0.48
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1697 109.2 — — — — +50 — — 46.7% -0.53 0–1 1–0 — -0.24
27 1980 1552 114.3 — — — — +26 — — 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50 1995 1673 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.01
28 1981 1612 122.2 — — — — — — — 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1630 109.6 — — — — -12 — — 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1603 109.9 — — — — -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1454 106.3 — — — — +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1476 106.7 — — — — +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 1522 112.2 — — — — +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1455 108.3 — — — — +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1412 109.7 — — — — -11 — +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1680 112.0 — — — — +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88 — 1790 134.8 — — — — +23 -158 +6 48.1% -0.26 27–30 (47%) 18–15 (55%) 105.0 -2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.