H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tina Mochizuki vs Janet Haas H2H: 0-1

Janet Haas holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Haas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janet Haas won the 1972 Raleigh round of 32 6-0 6-1.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janet Haas 6-0 6-1 Tina Mochizuki Match data Jun 29, 1972* R32 Raleigh WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Mochizuki 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Janet Haas 1,622 30 43 41.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Tina Mochizuki Janet Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0 1972 6–7 46.2% 1,516 0 0
1969 0–2 0.0% 1,449 0 0 1973 9–13 40.9% 1,567 0 0
1970 0–2 0.0% 1,424 0 0 1974 9–15 37.5% 1,524 0 0
1971 2–3 40.0% 1,445 0 0 1975 4–7 36.4% 1,487 0 0
1972 3–5 37.5% 1,432 0 0 1980 2–1 66.7% 1,505 0 0
1973 3–2 60.0% 1,463 0 0
1974 0–1 0.0% 1,452 0 0
1978 0–1 0.0% 1,438 0 0
1980 15–10 60.0% 1,552 0 0
1981 13–7 65.0% 1,612 0 1
1982 6–3 66.7% 1,629 0 1
1983 11–13 45.8% 1,602 0 1
1984 5–17 22.7% 1,454 0 1
1985 5–12 29.4% 1,475 0 1
1986 11–19 36.7% 1,521 0 1
1987 8–25 24.2% 1,455 0 1
1988 2–11 15.4% 1,411 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Tina Mochizuki Janet Haas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1969 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0%
1970 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
1971 2 3 5 40.0% 1975 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 2 1 3 66.7%
1973 3 2 5 60.0%
1974 0 1 1 0.0%
1980 8 6 14 57.1%
1981 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0%
1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
1988 0 7 7 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4% Career 0 2 2 0.0% 22 27 49 44.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Tina Mochizuki Janet Haas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1484 98.0 0.0% -2.50 +0.09 1972 1516 107.8 +19 +19 42.3% -0.61 1–1 0–1 +1.01
1969 1450 94.9 20.0% -1.60 0–1 +0.55 1973 1568 116.9 +4 -23 43.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 2–0 +1.09
1970 1425 82.2 0.0% -5.75 +0.38 1974 1524 110.3 +16 +3 +20 40.0% -0.76 2–2 (50%) +2.00
1971 1446 105.4 +83 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.16 1975 1487 101.2 +24 30.4% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.5 +0.84
1972 1432 89.9 +20 +60 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 +1.65 1980 1506 104.8 +17 66.7% +1.50 +0.38
1973 1464 107.3 +59 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 +0.92
1974 1453 100.4 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.16
1978 1438 98.2 0.0% -2.00 +0.06
1980 1552 114.3 +26 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50
1981 1612 122.2 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50
1982 1630 109.6 -12 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) +1.68
1983 1603 109.9 -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25
1984 1454 106.3 +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89
1985 1476 106.7 +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99
1986 1522 112.2 +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60
1987 1455 108.3 +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36
1988 1412 109.7 -11 +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19
Career 1680 112.0 +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88 Career 1622 112.6 +16 +10 +7 41.1% -0.74 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 103.4 +7.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.