H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tina Mochizuki vs Janet Haas H2H: 0-1
Janet Haas holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Haas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janet Haas won the 1972 Raleigh third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1972* | Raleigh | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Janet Haas | 6-0 6-1 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Janet Haas | — | — | — | 1,627 | 30 | 43 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tina Mochizuki | Janet Haas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |