H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tina Mochizuki vs Jill Davis H2H: 1-0

Tina Mochizuki holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Davis in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Tina Mochizuki won the 1981 Fayetteville final 6-4 6-4.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tina Mochizuki 6-4 6-4 Jill Davis Match data Jul 19, 1981* F Fayetteville WTA 250

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Mochizuki 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jill Davis 1,641 20 24 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Tina Mochizuki Jill Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% 1,502 0 0
1969 0–2 0.0% 1,449 0 0 1980 2–5 28.6% 1,484 0 0
1970 0–2 0.0% 1,424 0 0 1981 7–4 63.6% 1,549 0 0
1971 2–3 40.0% 1,445 0 0 1982 7–6 53.8% 1,627 0 0
1972 3–5 37.5% 1,432 0 0 1983 3–7 30.0% 1,614 0 0
1973 3–2 60.0% 1,463 0 0
1974 0–1 0.0% 1,452 0 0
1978 0–1 0.0% 1,438 0 0
1980 15–10 60.0% 1,552 0 0
1981 13–7 65.0% 1,612 0 1
1982 6–3 66.7% 1,629 0 1
1983 11–13 45.8% 1,602 0 1
1984 5–17 22.7% 1,454 0 1
1985 5–12 29.4% 1,475 0 1
1986 11–19 36.7% 1,521 0 1
1987 8–25 24.2% 1,455 0 1
1988 2–11 15.4% 1,411 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Tina Mochizuki Jill Davis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 1 2 3 33.3%
1969 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1970 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
1971 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1973 3 2 5 60.0%
1974 0 1 1 0.0%
1980 8 6 14 57.1%
1981 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0%
1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
1988 0 7 7 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4% Career 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Tina Mochizuki Jill Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1484 98.0 0.0% -2.50 +0.09 1979 1502 103.3 +56 33.3% -1.17 1–0 +0.14
1969 1450 94.9 20.0% -1.60 0–1 +0.55 1980 1484 97.9 35.7% -0.43 1–1 0–2 +0.17
1970 1425 82.2 0.0% -5.75 +0.38 1981 1549 114.9 65.2% +1.17 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.22
1971 1446 105.4 +83 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.16 1982 1628 123.7 -10 +12 54.8% +0.26 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -0.05
1972 1432 89.9 +20 +60 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 +1.65 1983 1614 114.2 -25 +35 36.4% -0.59 0–2 1–1 -0.64
1973 1464 107.3 +59 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 +0.92
1974 1453 100.4 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.16
1978 1438 98.2 0.0% -2.00 +0.06
1980 1552 114.3 +26 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50
1981 1612 122.2 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50
1982 1630 109.6 -12 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) +1.68
1983 1603 109.9 -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25
1984 1454 106.3 +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89
1985 1476 106.7 +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99
1986 1522 112.2 +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60
1987 1455 108.3 +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36
1988 1412 109.7 -11 +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19
Career 1680 112.0 +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88 Career 1642 118.4 -15 +33 49.0% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.