H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tina Mochizuki vs Kristin Kinney H2H: 1-1
Tina Mochizuki and Kristin Kinney are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristin Kinney leads 1–0 on grass, while Tina Mochizuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Mochizuki won the 1986 Tulsa third round 0-6 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1986* | Tulsa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tina Mochizuki | 0-6 6-2 7-6 | Kristin Kinney | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1985* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Kristin Kinney | 7-5 6-1 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kristin Kinney | #387 | #117 | 6 | 1,532 | 16 | 43 | 27.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tina Mochizuki | Kristin Kinney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #120 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |