H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tina Mochizuki vs Mary Mclean H2H: 1-0
Tina Mochizuki holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Mclean in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tina Mochizuki leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tina Mochizuki won the 1971 Birmingham third round 6-7 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1971* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tina Mochizuki | 6-7 7-5 6-4 | Mary Mclean | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mary Mclean | — | — | — | 1,508 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tina Mochizuki | Mary Mclean | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,405 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,360 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,345 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |