H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Melissa Gurney holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Melissa Gurney leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Melissa Gurney won the 1985 Indianapolis 2 round of 16 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa Gurney | 6-0 6-3 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data | Oct 11, 1985* | R16 | Indianapolis 2 | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,679 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Melissa Gurney | #1,006 | #17 | 33 | 1,884 | 63 | 61 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tina Mochizuki | Melissa Gurney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #23 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #92 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #97 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,411 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tina Mochizuki | Melissa Gurney | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1968 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 16 | 1969 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 17 | 1970 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 19 | 1972 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1982 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1983 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1984 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1987 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1988 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 36 | 62 | 98 | 36.7% | 9 | 27 | 36 | 25.0% | 12 | 21 | 33 | 36.4% | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | — | 44 | 33 | 77 | 57.1% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tina Mochizuki | Melissa Gurney | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1968 | 1484 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | 1984 | 1561 | 123.0 | — | — | — | — | +69 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.41 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.59 |
| 16 | 1969 | 1450 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.55 | 1985 | 1629 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | -65 | 48.9% | -0.04 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 17 | 1970 | 1425 | 82.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.75 | — | — | — | +0.38 | 1986 | 1866 | 150.1 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -270 | -266 | 64.8% | +1.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.5 | +0.40 |
| 18 | 1971 | 1446 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +83 | — | 41.7% | -1.67 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.16 | 1987 | 1660 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | — | 43.4% | -0.53 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.3 | +2.75 |
| 19 | 1972 | 1432 | 89.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +60 | — | 35.3% | -1.53 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +1.65 | 1988 | 1581 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -38 | — | 40.8% | -0.84 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–2 | — | +0.93 |
| 20 | 1973 | 1464 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | +59 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.55 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.92 | 1989 | 1562 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 21 | 1974 | 1453 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 1438 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 1552 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | — | 58.6% | +0.64 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.3 | +2.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1981 | 1612 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 61.2% | +0.75 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1982 | 1630 | 109.6 | — | — | — | — | -12 | — | — | 57.9% | +0.47 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +1.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1983 | 1603 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -38 | +4 | 45.0% | -0.18 | 7–5 (58%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.8 | +2.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1984 | 1454 | 106.3 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +74 | +143 | 34.6% | -0.73 | 0–8 (0%) | 1–5 (17%) | 87.8 | +1.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 1476 | 106.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -8 | +73 | 27.8% | -1.78 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.1 | +0.99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 1522 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -72 | +33 | 36.4% | -1.26 | 4–2 (67%) | 6–3 (67%) | 106.4 | +1.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1987 | 1455 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -45 | +65 | 27.4% | -1.58 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.7 | +0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1988 | 1412 | 109.7 | — | — | — | — | -11 | — | +90 | 25.8% | -1.32 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.9 | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1680 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +8 | +60 | 40.2% | -0.71 | 31–39 (44%) | 20–25 (44%) | 98.4 | +6.88 | — | 1884 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -137 | -180 | 52.2% | +0.24 | 10–20 (33%) | 6–9 (40%) | 91.7 | +4.02 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camille Benjamin | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 21, 1988 | H2H |
| Alycia Moulton | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 14, 1985 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 3 | 3 | Dec 31, 1987 | H2H |
| Vicki Nelson | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 30, 1987 | H2H |
| Bonnie Gadusek | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 3, 1987 | H2H |
| Catherine Tanvier | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1988 | H2H |
| Elly Hakami | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 22, 1988 | H2H |
| Lea Antonoplis | 3 | 0 | 3 | Apr 18, 1987 | H2H |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 17, 1986 | H2H |