H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tina Mochizuki vs Patty Fendick H2H: 0-2
Patty Fendick holds a 2–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1986 Los Angeles third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 73
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1986* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-2 6-3 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-1 6-0 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tina Mochizuki | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |