H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tina Mochizuki vs Patty Fendick H2H: 0-2

Patty Fendick holds a 2–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1986 Los Angeles round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tina Mochizuki
USA Age 73
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patty Fendick #110 6-2 6-3 Tina Mochizuki Match data Aug 14, 1986* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard
Patty Fendick #110 6-1 6-0 Tina Mochizuki Match data Aug 6, 1986* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Mochizuki — — — 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tina Mochizuki Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,424 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,445 0 0 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,432 0 0 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,463 0 0 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,550 0 0
21 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,452 0 0 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,739 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3
27 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,552 0 0 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3
28 1981 13–7 65.0% — 1,612 0 1 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 1982 6–3 66.7% — 1,629 0 1 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,724 0 3
30 1983 11–13 45.8% — 1,602 0 1 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3
31 1984 5–17 22.7% — 1,454 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1985 5–12 29.4% — 1,475 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1986 11–19 36.7% — 1,521 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1987 8–25 24.2% — 1,455 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 1988 2–11 15.4% — 1,411 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tina Mochizuki Patty Fendick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1980 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 1982 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4% — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tina Mochizuki Patty Fendick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1450 94.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1425 82.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.75 — — — +0.38 1982 1500 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32
18 1971 1446 105.4 — — — — — +83 — 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.16 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +81 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.97
19 1972 1432 89.9 — — — — +20 +60 — 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 — +1.65 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32
20 1973 1464 107.3 — — — — +59 — — 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +31 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.32
21 1974 1453 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16 1986 1643 127.4 — — — — -7 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1674 134.5 — — — — -15 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.36
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1798 142.2 — — — — +11 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.37
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1763 138.6 — — — — +28 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.33
25 1978 1438 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 1990 1740 136.0 — — — — +3 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -91 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64
27 1980 1552 114.3 — — — — +26 — — 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -32 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86
28 1981 1612 122.2 — — — — — — — 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50 1993 1839 147.9 — — — — -9 — +30 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37
29 1982 1630 109.6 — — — — -12 — — 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.68 1994 1725 142.2 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50
30 1983 1603 109.9 — — — — -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25 1995 1691 135.9 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51
31 1984 1454 106.3 — — — — +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1476 106.7 — — — — +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 1522 112.2 — — — — +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1455 108.3 — — — — +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1412 109.7 — — — — -11 — +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1680 112.0 — — — — +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88 — 1883 144.8 — — — — +11 -97 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.