H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tina Pisnik vs Amelie Cocheteux H2H: 0-1

Amelie Cocheteux holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Pisnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amelie Cocheteux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amelie Cocheteux won the 1999 Pattaya round of 32 6-1 1-0 RET.

SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 48 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amelie Cocheteux #66 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Tina Pisnik #85 Match data Nov 18, 1999* R32 Pattaya Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Pisnik #592 #29 1,046 1,720 91 119 43.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amelie Cocheteux #365 #55 552 1,583 28 53 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tina Pisnik Amelie Cocheteux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1998 0–1 0.0% #414 1,493 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #228 1,489 0 0
18 1999 11–9 55.0% #81 1,595 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #166 1,468 0 0
19 2000 10–16 38.5% #73 1,586 0 1 1997 2–3 40.0% #104 1,492 0 0
20 2001 16–17 48.5% #63 1,625 0 1 1998 7–11 38.9% #81 1,529 0 0
21 2002 23–24 48.9% #47 1,688 0 1 1999 15–19 44.1% #64 1,565 0 0
22 2003 23–27 46.0% #31 1,718 0 1 2000 4–17 19.0% #180 1,463 0 0
23 2004 8–23 25.8% #131 1,536 0 1
24 2005 0–2 0.0% #495 1,501 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tina Pisnik Amelie Cocheteux
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2000 2 7 9 22.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2002 14 15 29 48.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2004 3 13 16 18.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2005 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 40 63 103 38.8% 29 36 65 44.6% 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 11 17 28 39.3% 12 23 35 34.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 6 10 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tina Pisnik Amelie Cocheteux
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1998 1493 94.0 0.0% -4.50 -0.07 1995 1490 99.1 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 +0.07
18 1999 1596 124.1 -4 +11 52.2% +0.17 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.1 +0.01 1996 1468 94.6 0.0% -3.25 +0.18
19 2000 1586 123.4 -30 +38 +7 44.4% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 4–6 (40%) 93.0 -0.32 1997 1492 108.2 +57 36.4% -1.00 1–0 0–1 +0.11
20 2001 1626 120.7 -13 -18 +17 50.6% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 9–6 (60%) 99.3 +0.35 1998 1530 115.1 +15 +34 41.0% -0.72 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 +0.42
21 2002 1689 130.6 -18 -42 -52 48.0% -0.32 8–4 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.7 -2.20 1999 1565 110.5 +39 -57 -53 42.0% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 5–0 (100%) 107.5 +1.17
22 2003 1719 131.1 +1.33 +1.11 1.083 51.5% -38 -38 -46 47.5% -0.01 10–10 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 -0.09 2000 1463 103.9 +81 -6 28.3% -1.89 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.44
23 2004 1536 108.7 -2.55 -0.52 0.706 40.8% -6 +61 +85 37.1% -0.90 2–10 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 91.2 +0.80
24 2005 1502 94.2 0.0% -3.50 +0.16
Career 1721 127.5 +0.36 +0.70 0.962 48.8% -19 -5 -3 46.1% -0.32 33–40 (45%) 21–24 (47%) 96.1 -0.66 1583 110.6 +49 -5 -53 36.6% -1.18 9–11 (45%) 8–7 (53%) 100.7 +1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.