H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tina Pisnik vs Angela Haynes H2H: 1-0

Tina Pisnik holds a 1–0 lead over Angela Haynes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tina Pisnik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Pisnik won the 2003 US Open round of 128 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tina Pisnik
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Angela Haynes
USA Age 41 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tina Pisnik #50 6-4 6-2 Angela Haynes #221 Match data Aug 27, 2003* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Pisnik #592 #29 1,046 1,720 91 119 43.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Angela Haynes #1,161 #95 509 1,546 15 36 29.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tina Pisnik Angela Haynes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1998 0–1 0.0% #414 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1999 11–9 55.0% #81 1,595 0 0 2003 1–5 16.7% #184 1,471 0 0
19 2000 10–16 38.5% #73 1,586 0 1 2004 2–5 28.6% #136 1,477 0 0
20 2001 16–17 48.5% #63 1,625 0 1 2005 5–14 26.3% #131 1,451 0 0
21 2002 23–24 48.9% #47 1,688 0 1 2006 1–4 20.0% #171 1,437 0 0
22 2003 23–27 46.0% #31 1,718 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2004 8–23 25.8% #131 1,536 0 1 2008 4–3 57.1% #140 1,505 0 0
24 2005 0–2 0.0% #495 1,501 0 1 2009 2–5 28.6% #170 1,501 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tina Pisnik Angela Haynes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 2 7 9 22.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2004 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2002 14 15 29 48.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2006 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 3 13 16 18.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 40 63 103 38.8% 29 36 65 44.6% 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — 15 30 45 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 8/81 of Tina Pisnik's and 20/51 of Angela Haynes's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tina Pisnik Angela Haynes
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/6 4.0 5.0 66.7% 60.0% 35.0% 61.5% 100.0% 51.7% 33.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/7 2.3 2.3 71.7% 62.9% 54.9% 57.1% 37.8% 60.6% 41.4%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 4/19 2.8 2.8 70.0% 57.6% 41.7% 58.5% 30.0% 53.1% 39.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/5 2.0 2.5 69.8% 63.3% 35.4% 46.4% 0.0% 54.8% 27.8%
22 2003 6/50 3.5 3.5 61.0% 64.0% 48.9% 40.6% 49.4% 58.0% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 2/31 1.5 4.5 66.5% 46.0% 28.9% 45.0% 30.0% 40.0% 42.3% 2008 3/7 1.3 2.3 67.2% 57.7% 48.8% 28.1% 31.8% 54.9% 36.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 7/7 2.4 3.1 64.7% 63.6% 42.6% 32.8% 52.1% 55.9% 37.8%
Career — 8/210 3.0 3.8 62.4% 59.5% 43.9% 41.7% 44.6% 53.5% 44.7% — 20/51 2.4 2.9 67.8% 61.2% 44.1% 43.7% 39.7% 55.6% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tina Pisnik Angela Haynes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1998 1493 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1596 124.1 — — — — -4 +11 — 52.2% +0.17 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.1 +0.01 2003 1472 101.7 -0.96 -0.60 0.690 43.5% +15 — — 23.1% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.38
19 2000 1586 123.4 — — — — -30 +38 +7 44.4% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 4–6 (40%) 93.0 -0.32 2004 1477 110.0 +1.14 -1.02 1.050 50.8% +7 — — 26.7% -0.80 1–0 1–4 (20%) — +0.05
20 2001 1626 120.7 — — — — -13 -18 +17 50.6% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 9–6 (60%) 99.3 +0.35 2005 1452 110.2 -1.02 -1.68 0.838 46.7% +33 +14 — 31.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 97.8 +0.17
21 2002 1689 130.6 — — — — -18 -42 -52 48.0% -0.32 8–4 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.7 -2.20 2006 1438 98.2 -0.73 -2.50 0.616 41.9% +18 — — 18.2% -2.64 1–0 — — -0.19
22 2003 1719 131.1 +1.33 +1.11 1.083 51.5% -38 -38 -46 47.5% -0.01 10–10 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 1536 108.7 -2.55 -0.52 0.706 40.8% -6 +61 +85 37.1% -0.90 2–10 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 91.2 +0.80 2008 1506 114.8 -1.17 -1.75 0.805 46.4% +25 — — 50.0% -0.37 2–0 1–0 — -0.01
24 2005 1502 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.16 2009 1502 115.6 +0.18 -2.58 0.857 46.9% +39 — — 37.5% -1.25 0–2 0–1 — -0.19
Career — 1721 127.5 +0.36 +0.70 0.962 48.8% -19 -5 -3 46.1% -0.32 33–40 (45%) 21–24 (47%) 96.1 -0.66 — 1546 113.8 -0.27 -1.93 0.837 46.7% +24 +14 — 31.9% -1.38 5–6 (45%) 5–10 (33%) 98.7 +0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.