H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tina Pisnik vs Meilen Tu H2H: 3-0
Tina Pisnik holds a 3–0 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tina Pisnik leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Pisnik won the 2002 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-0 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2002 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Tina Pisnik | 6-0 3-6 6-1 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
| Oct 27, 2001* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Tina Pisnik | 7-6(1) 7-6(5) | Meilen Tu | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2001* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Tina Pisnik | 6-1 1-6 7-6(4) | Meilen Tu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Pisnik | #592 | #29 | 1,046 | 1,721 | 91 | 117 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tina Pisnik | Meilen Tu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #81 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #131 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |