H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tina Pisnik vs Meilen Tu H2H: 3-0

Tina Pisnik holds a 3–0 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tina Pisnik leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Pisnik won the 2002 Libéma Open round of 32 6-0 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tina Pisnik
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tina Pisnik #50 6-0 3-6 6-1 Meilen Tu #55 Match data Jun 20, 2002* R32 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Tina Pisnik #86 7-6(1) 7-6(5) Meilen Tu #47 Match data Oct 27, 2001* QF Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tina Pisnik #82 6-1 1-6 7-6(4) Meilen Tu #40 Match data Jun 14, 2001* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Pisnik #592 #29 1,046 1,720 91 119 43.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tina Pisnik Meilen Tu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0
17 1998 0–1 0.0% #414 1,493 0 0 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0
18 1999 11–9 55.0% #81 1,595 0 0 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0
19 2000 10–16 38.5% #73 1,586 0 1 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0
20 2001 16–17 48.5% #63 1,625 0 1 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0
21 2002 23–24 48.9% #47 1,688 0 1 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0
22 2003 23–27 46.0% #31 1,718 0 1 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0
23 2004 8–23 25.8% #131 1,536 0 1 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1
24 2005 0–2 0.0% #495 1,501 0 1 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tina Pisnik Meilen Tu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2000 2 7 9 22.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 14 15 29 48.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 3 13 16 18.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2005 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 40 63 103 38.8% 29 36 65 44.6% 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tina Pisnik Meilen Tu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21
17 1998 1493 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04
18 1999 1596 124.1 — — — — -4 +11 — 52.2% +0.17 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.1 +0.01 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25
19 2000 1586 123.4 — — — — -30 +38 +7 44.4% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 4–6 (40%) 93.0 -0.32 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01
20 2001 1626 120.7 — — — — -13 -18 +17 50.6% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 9–6 (60%) 99.3 +0.35 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08
21 2002 1689 130.6 — — — — -18 -42 -52 48.0% -0.32 8–4 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.7 -2.20 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21
22 2003 1719 131.1 +1.33 +1.11 1.083 51.5% -38 -38 -46 47.5% -0.01 10–10 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 -0.09 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26
23 2004 1536 108.7 -2.55 -0.52 0.706 40.8% -6 +61 +85 37.1% -0.90 2–10 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 91.2 +0.80 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97
24 2005 1502 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.16 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20
Career — 1721 127.5 +0.36 +0.70 0.962 48.8% -19 -5 -3 46.1% -0.32 33–40 (45%) 21–24 (47%) 96.1 -0.66 — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.