H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tina Pisnik vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 1-1
Tina Pisnik and Sandra Cacic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Pisnik won the 2002 US Open first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tina Pisnik | 6-2 6-2 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2001* | Gold Coast | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Tina Pisnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Pisnik | #592 | #29 | 1,046 | 1,721 | 91 | 117 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tina Pisnik | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #81 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #131 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |