H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tina Pisnik vs Tatiana Poutchek H2H: 1-1
Tina Pisnik and Tatiana Poutchek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tina Pisnik leads 1–0 on clay, while Tatiana Poutchek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Poutchek won the 2003 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 47
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tatiana Poutchek | 6-3 6-0 | Tina Pisnik | Match data |
| May 3, 2001* | Bol | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tina Pisnik | 6-2 6-3 | Tatiana Poutchek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Pisnik | #592 | #29 | 1,046 | 1,721 | 91 | 117 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Tatiana Poutchek | #1,078 | #55 | 609 | 1,626 | 51 | 101 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tina Pisnik | Tatiana Poutchek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #734 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #81 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #131 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #121 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #94 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |