H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tine Scheuer Larsen vs Cecilia Dahlman H2H: 0-1 (incl. walkovers)

Tine Scheuer Larsen vs Cecilia Dahlman: 0–0 excluding walkovers; 0–1 including 1 walkover. Across 1 main-draw results including walkovers, Cecilia Dahlman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cecilia Dahlman won the 1991 Oslo round of 16 W/O.

DEN Age 60 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H including walkovers
0 1
1 main-draw results
SWE Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cecilia Dahlman #85 (w/o) Tine Scheuer Larsen Match data Feb 9, 1991* R16 Oslo Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tine Scheuer Larsen 1,725 73 92 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cecilia Dahlman #405 #63 17 1,673 38 63 37.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tine Scheuer Larsen Cecilia Dahlman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 0–1 0.0% #297 1,482 0 0
18 1984 10–12 45.5% 1,588 0 0
19 1985 16–17 48.5% 1,677 0 0 1988 2–5 28.6% #165 1,478 0 0
20 1986 22–19 53.7% 1,707 0 0 1989 9–9 50.0% #94 1,585 0 1
21 1987 7–16 30.4% 1,616 0 0 1990 16–20 44.4% #82 1,639 0 2
22 1988 7–11 38.9% 1,590 0 0 1991 6–18 25.0% #189 1,490 0 2
23 1989 8–12 40.0% 1,575 0 0 1992 2–4 33.3% #123 1,497 0 2
24 1990 2–4 33.3% 1,560 0 0 1993 3–6 33.3% #192 1,512 0 2
25 1991 1–1 50.0% 1,571 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tine Scheuer Larsen Cecilia Dahlman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
19 1985 2 6 8 25.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1991 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 18 31 49 36.7% 40 40 80 50.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 6 18 24 25.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tine Scheuer Larsen Cecilia Dahlman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1482 96.1 0.0% -2.50 +0.21
18 1984 1588 124.0 +41 +14 -5 45.8% -0.02 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.0 +0.19
19 1985 1677 130.0 -75 +46 52.2% +0.35 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.34 1988 1478 107.9 +33 38.9% -0.72 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.25
20 1986 1707 129.1 -59 +27 52.9% +0.21 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.0 +1.74 1989 1586 124.1 -77 +74 47.6% -0.36 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.9 +1.53
21 1987 1616 116.8 -58 +92 32.0% -1.42 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) -1.61 1990 1640 129.0 -81 +22 -22 46.3% -0.49 3–5 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 +0.28
22 1988 1591 116.4 -24 +45 43.9% -0.15 1–4 (20%) +1.76 1991 1490 103.6 +47 +73 +72 26.5% -1.57 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.0 +1.03
23 1989 1575 124.3 +36 -4 46.8% -0.17 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 -0.21 1992 1497 105.9 +33 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.33
24 1990 1561 111.7 +24 40.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) +0.08 1993 1513 115.6 +90 35.0% -1.05 1–1 0–3 (0%) -0.48
25 1991 1572 101.3 100.0% +3.50 +0.21
Career 1726 129.6 -35 +37 -5 46.8% -0.12 13–26 (33%) 8–13 (38%) 89.7 +1.12 1673 122.0 -16 +52 +9 39.8% -0.82 12–16 (43%) 13–9 (59%) 101.7 +3.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.