H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tine Scheuer Larsen vs Donna Faber H2H: 0-1

Donna Faber holds a 1–0 lead over Tine Scheuer Larsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1989 US Open round of 64 6-3 6-0.

DEN Age 60 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Faber #82 6-3 6-0 Tine Scheuer Larsen Match data Aug 31, 1989* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tine Scheuer Larsen 1,725 73 92 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tine Scheuer Larsen Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 1984 10–12 45.5% 1,588 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 1985 16–17 48.5% 1,677 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 1986 22–19 53.7% 1,707 0 0 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 1987 7–16 30.4% 1,616 0 0 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1988 7–11 38.9% 1,590 0 0
23 1989 8–12 40.0% 1,575 0 0
24 1990 2–4 33.3% 1,560 0 0
25 1991 1–1 50.0% 1,571 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tine Scheuer Larsen Donna Faber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
17 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1985 2 6 8 25.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1991 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 18 31 49 36.7% 40 40 80 50.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tine Scheuer Larsen Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1496 103.9 33.3% -0.17 +0.11
16 1988 1532 112.2 +4 +14 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 +0.30
17 1989 1675 137.0 +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 1984 1588 124.0 +41 +14 -5 45.8% -0.02 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.0 +0.19 1990 1631 115.4 -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) +0.90
19 1985 1677 130.0 -75 +46 52.2% +0.35 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.34 1991 1593 109.9 -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 1986 1707 129.1 -59 +27 52.9% +0.21 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.0 +1.74 1992 1542 119.9 +26 +37 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 1987 1616 116.8 -58 +92 32.0% -1.42 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) -1.61 1993 1432 94.2 +34 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1988 1591 116.4 -24 +45 43.9% -0.15 1–4 (20%) +1.76
23 1989 1575 124.3 +36 -4 46.8% -0.17 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 -0.21
24 1990 1561 111.7 +24 40.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) +0.08
25 1991 1572 101.3 100.0% +3.50 +0.21
Career 1726 129.6 -35 +37 -5 46.8% -0.12 13–26 (33%) 8–13 (38%) 89.7 +1.12 1719 121.4 +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.