H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tory Ann Fretz vs Ching Ling Chang H2H: 1-0

Tory Ann Fretz holds a 1–0 lead over Ching Ling Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tory Ann Fretz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tory Ann Fretz won the 1974 Fort Lauderdale round of 32 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tory Ann Fretz
USA Age 84
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Ching Ling Chang
USA Age 78

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tory Ann Fretz 7-5 6-1 Ching Ling Chang Match data Feb 7, 1974* R32 Fort Lauderdale WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tory Ann Fretz — — — 1,798 104 102 50.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ching Ling Chang — — — 1,500 13 41 24.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tory Ann Fretz Ching Ling Chang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 — — — — — — — 1971 0–5 0.0% — 1,467 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1972 0–3 0.0% — 1,442 0 0
25 1968 28–14 66.7% — 1,670 0 0 1973 5–11 31.2% — 1,445 0 0
26 1969 27–17 61.4% — 1,710 0 0 1974 8–16 33.3% — 1,466 0 0
27 1970 5–7 41.7% — 1,672 0 0 1975 0–6 0.0% — 1,411 0 0
28 1971 19–22 46.3% — 1,736 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1973 10–20 33.3% — 1,696 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1974 9–13 40.9% — 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1975 2–2 50.0% — 1,720 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1976 4–6 40.0% — 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,700 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tory Ann Fretz Ching Ling Chang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1968 7 3 10 70.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
26 1969 2 1 3 66.7% 17 8 25 68.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1974 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1970 4 2 6 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1971 8 3 11 72.7% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1973 5 5 10 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1974 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 18 46 60.9% 37 35 72 51.4% 24 23 47 51.1% 13 23 36 36.1% — 3 7 10 30.0% 6 15 21 28.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tory Ann Fretz Ching Ling Chang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1468 98.2 — — — — — — +43 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.06
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1442 90.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.27
25 1968 1670 123.2 — — — — -16 -45 +14 67.4% +1.28 3–4 (43%) — — +0.45 1973 1445 99.8 — — — — — +24 +44 34.3% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.08
26 1969 1711 137.3 — — — — +23 +45 -58 59.3% +1.12 3–6 (33%) — — -3.71 1974 1467 93.7 — — — — +96 -3 — 35.8% -1.49 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 +0.93
27 1970 1673 115.3 — — — — +62 +24 — 50.0% +0.46 0–2 0–1 — +0.30 1975 1412 92.1 — — — — — — — 7.7% -3.31 0–1 1–0 — +0.28
28 1971 1736 141.5 — — — — +56 +6 -129 47.2% +0.02 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 103.4 -2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1973 1697 139.0 — — — — +90 -44 -100 38.5% -0.75 0–7 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 93.7 -3.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1974 1726 127.7 — — — — -15 -78 -58 41.3% -0.50 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — -1.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1975 1720 119.5 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.00 0–2 — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1976 1726 119.3 — — — — -13 — — 36.8% -1.84 0–1 1–0 — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1981 1701 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 138.6 — — — — +36 0 -49 51.7% +0.29 16–27 (37%) 7–5 (58%) 95.0 -5.38 — 1500 93.3 — — — — +96 +8 +44 28.3% -1.86 3–6 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 101.2 +4.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.