H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tory Ann Fretz vs Joanne Russell H2H: 0-1
Joanne Russell holds a 1–0 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joanne Russell leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Joanne Russell won the 1976 Philadelphia third round 6-7(1) 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1976* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Joanne Russell | 6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Joanne Russell | — | — | — | 1,935 | 203 | 199 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tory Ann Fretz | Joanne Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–22 | 47.6% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |