H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tory Ann Fretz vs Penny Moor H2H: 0-1
Penny Moor holds a 1–0 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Penny Moor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Penny Moor won the 1973 Richmond third round 5-7 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1973* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Penny Moor | 5-7 6-1 6-3 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Penny Moor | — | — | — | 1,552 | 53 | 111 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tory Ann Fretz | Penny Moor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 7–21 | 25.0% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |