H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Tracy Austin vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-2

Ann Grossman holds a 2–0 lead over Tracy Austin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1994 Hobart International round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Grossman #35 6-4 6-4 Tracy Austin #115 Match data Jan 13, 1994* R32 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Ann Grossman #36 4-6 6-1 6-4 Tracy Austin #116 Match data Nov 11, 1993* R32 Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tracy Austin #81 #1 19 2,502 339 88 79.4% 2 0 1 5 20 28
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tracy Austin Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1978 43–13 76.8% #6 2,057 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,431 1 9 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1980 81–10 89.0% #2 2,450 1 19 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,442 2 27 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,262 2 28 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,185 2 28 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1984 2–2 50.0% #27 2,136 2 28 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,078 2 28 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
30 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,970 2 28 — — — — — — —
31 1994 5–8 38.5% #81 1,850 2 28 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tracy Austin Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 18 4 22 81.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7% 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3% 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4% 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 101 26 127 79.5% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tracy Austin Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1977 1780 149.9 — — — — -85 -30 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 2057 163.2 — — — — +12 -252 -337 72.6% +1.96 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2431 178.8 — — — — +6 -369 -545 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -9.11 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 1980 2451 179.3 — — — — +144 -317 -403 85.3% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.4 -3.63 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1981 2442 175.7 — — — — +118 -334 -333 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 -3.49 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1982 2263 167.1 — — — — +182 -144 -203 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.08 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1983 2186 159.6 — — — — +138 -57 -80 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.73 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1984 2137 114.9 — — — — +108 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 1989 2079 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
30 1993 1970 123.3 — — — — +25 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1851 118.5 — — — — +76 +127 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2502 175.2 — — — — +84 -168 -342 76.2% +2.12 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 109.1 -5.41 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.