H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Tracy Austin vs Kate Latham H2H: 6-0

Tracy Austin holds a 6–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1983 Roland Garros round of 128 6-7 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tracy Austin 6-7 6-1 6-3 Kate Latham Match data May 25, 1983* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tracy Austin 6-0 6-0 Kate Latham Match data Jul 31, 1982* QF San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-0 Kate Latham Match data Feb 28, 1980* R32 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-1 Kate Latham Match data Jan 11, 1980* R16 Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-0 Kate Latham Match data Sep 3, 1979* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tracy Austin 4-6 6-3 6-1 Kate Latham Match data Mar 31, 1977* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tracy Austin — #1 19 2,522 341 88 79.5% 2 0 1 12 15 30
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tracy Austin Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1978 44–13 77.2% #6 2,087 0 3 — — — — — — —
16 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,436 1 10 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1980 82–10 89.1% #2 2,463 1 21 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,449 2 29 — — — — — — —
19 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,267 2 30 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,189 2 30 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1984 2–2 50.0% — 2,139 2 30 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3
26 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,081 2 30 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5
30 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,972 2 30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6
31 1994 5–8 38.5% — 1,852 2 30 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tracy Austin Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 102 26 128 79.7% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tracy Austin Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1977 1781 150.1 — — — — -85 -31 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 2087 165.9 — — — — -15 -282 -367 73.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.9 -2.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2436 178.9 — — — — +5 -373 -551 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -8.70 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1980 2464 180.2 — — — — +151 -327 -415 85.5% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -4.53 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1981 2450 175.9 — — — — +119 -339 -340 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.5 -3.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 2267 167.2 — — — — +185 -147 -207 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.41 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61
20 1983 2189 159.8 — — — — +140 -59 -83 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.86 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1984 2140 115.0 — — — — +111 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97
26 1989 2082 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20
30 1993 1973 123.4 — — — — +28 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86
31 1994 1852 118.5 — — — — +78 +126 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 2522 175.8 — — — — +83 -173 -353 76.3% +2.13 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 108.9 -5.99 — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.