H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Tracy Austin vs Wendy White H2H: 3-0

Tracy Austin holds a 3–0 lead over Wendy White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1983 Chicago round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Wendy White
USA Age 65 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tracy Austin 6-4 6-3 Wendy White Match data Feb 17, 1983* R32 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-4 Wendy White Match data Aug 22, 1980* R16 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-2 Wendy White Match data Jun 20, 1980* R16 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tracy Austin #81 #1 19 2,502 339 88 79.4% 2 0 1 5 20 28
Wendy White #567 #28 24 1,856 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tracy Austin Wendy White
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1978 43–13 76.8% #6 2,057 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,431 1 9 — — — — — — —
17 1980 81–10 89.0% #2 2,450 1 19 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
18 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,442 2 27 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,554 0 0
19 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,262 2 28 1980 15–13 53.6% — 1,729 0 0
20 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,185 2 28 1981 16–16 50.0% — 1,767 0 0
21 1984 2–2 50.0% #27 2,136 2 28 1982 20–20 50.0% — 1,760 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1983 25–21 54.3% — 1,816 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1984 13–18 41.9% #67 1,717 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1985 8–16 33.3% #75 1,607 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1986 22–19 53.7% #45 1,701 0 1
26 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,078 2 28 1987 17–17 50.0% #34 1,732 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1988 10–16 38.5% #66 1,671 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1989 9–16 36.0% #102 1,614 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1990 3–9 25.0% #154 1,566 0 1
30 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,970 2 28 — — — — — — —
31 1994 5–8 38.5% #81 1,850 2 28 1992 0–1 0.0% #567 1,552 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tracy Austin Wendy White
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 18 4 22 81.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4% 1980 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
26 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 101 26 127 79.5% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6% — 61 78 139 43.9% 17 26 43 39.5% 43 43 86 50.0% 40 42 82 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tracy Austin Wendy White
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1977 1780 149.9 — — — — -85 -30 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 2057 163.2 — — — — +12 -252 -337 72.6% +1.96 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2431 178.8 — — — — +6 -369 -545 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -9.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 2451 179.3 — — — — +144 -317 -403 85.3% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.4 -3.63 1978 1491 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.08
18 1981 2442 175.7 — — — — +118 -334 -333 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 -3.49 1979 1554 130.3 — — — — +71 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.40
19 1982 2263 167.1 — — — — +182 -144 -203 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.08 1980 1730 140.3 — — — — -12 — -101 53.1% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.2 -1.19
20 1983 2186 159.6 — — — — +138 -57 -80 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.73 1981 1767 130.7 — — — — +7 -203 -117 49.3% +0.14 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 103.2 -1.36
21 1984 2137 114.9 — — — — +108 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03 1982 1761 136.1 — — — — +8 — -121 47.1% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.0 -1.25
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1817 144.2 — — — — +14 -121 -154 50.0% -0.02 11–5 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 106.1 -3.83
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1718 135.1 — — — — -9 -48 +26 44.3% -0.23 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 -1.52
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1608 111.7 — — — — +8 — +122 34.5% -1.05 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 +1.08
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1702 130.2 — — — — +2 -87 +29 52.0% +0.27 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 101.2 +1.66
26 1989 2079 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04 1987 1732 131.9 — — — — -64 -125 +101 46.6% -0.48 5–2 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 107.1 -1.31
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1671 122.3 — — — — -30 — +140 37.9% -1.00 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 -0.54
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1615 115.8 — — — — -3 -48 +119 39.3% -0.82 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 100.6 +0.21
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1567 104.6 — — — — +6 — +169 25.0% -1.68 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 -0.13
30 1993 1970 123.3 — — — — +25 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1851 118.5 — — — — +76 +127 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54 1992 1552 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
Career — 2502 175.2 — — — — +84 -168 -342 76.2% +2.12 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 109.1 -5.41 — 1856 137.2 — — — — -4 -116 +17 44.9% -0.33 59–44 (57%) 42–41 (51%) 107.1 -2.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.