H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tzipora Obziler vs Aiko Nakamura H2H: 1-1
Tzipora Obziler and Aiko Nakamura are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aiko Nakamura leads 1–0 on grass, while Tzipora Obziler leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aiko Nakamura won the 2008 Birmingham second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 53
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 42
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2008* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Aiko Nakamura | 7-5 6-3 | Tzipora Obziler | Match data |
| Feb 9, 2007* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Tzipora Obziler | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | Aiko Nakamura | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tzipora Obziler | #316 | #75 | 393 | 1,629 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aiko Nakamura | #730 | #47 | 569 | 1,645 | 50 | 76 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tzipora Obziler | Aiko Nakamura | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #71 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #57 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #66 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #146 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #677 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |