H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tzipora Obziler vs Paola Suarez H2H: 0-2
Paola Suarez holds a 2–0 lead over Tzipora Obziler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paola Suarez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2000 Amelia Island second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 53
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2000* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 6-1 6-1 | Tzipora Obziler | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1998* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 6-2 6-2 | Tzipora Obziler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tzipora Obziler | #316 | #75 | 393 | 1,629 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tzipora Obziler | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |