H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Valerie Ziegenfuss vs Laurie Tenney H2H: 1-0
Valerie Ziegenfuss holds a 1–0 lead over Laurie Tenney in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Valerie Ziegenfuss leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Valerie Ziegenfuss won the 1976 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-3 6-4 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Laurie Tenney | — | — | — | 1,720 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Laurie Tenney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 17–11 | 60.7% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |