H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Valerie Ziegenfuss vs Linda Tuero H2H: 2-3
Linda Tuero holds a 3–2 lead over Valerie Ziegenfuss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on grass, while Linda Tuero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Tuero won the 1972 Hamburg semifinal 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1972* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Linda Tuero | 6-4 6-1 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1971* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Linda Tuero | 6-1 3-6 7-6 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1969* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-1 8-6 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1969* | Manchester | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-3 6-3 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1968* | South Orange | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Linda Tuero | 7-5 1-6 6-3 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Linda Tuero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 |
| 20 | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 |
| 23 | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |