H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Vanessa Webb vs Fang Li H2H: 1-0

Vanessa Webb holds a 1–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vanessa Webb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vanessa Webb won the 2000 Pattaya round of 32 6-4 0-6 6-1.

CAN Age 50 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vanessa Webb #116 6-4 0-6 6-1 Fang Li #517 Match data Nov 14, 2000* R32 Pattaya Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vanessa Webb #838 #107 316 1,500 8 25 24.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vanessa Webb Fang Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #459 1,487 0 0
19 1995 0–2 0.0% #230 1,475 0 0 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0
20 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0
21 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0
22 1998 0–2 0.0% #218 1,464 0 0 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #141 1,449 0 0 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0
24 2000 4–9 30.8% #116 1,447 0 0 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0
25 2001 1–2 33.3% #205 1,452 0 0 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0
26 2002 2–5 28.6% #142 1,457 0 0 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0
27 2003 1–3 25.0% #171 1,438 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0
28 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vanessa Webb Fang Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 9 8 17 52.9%
23 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 6 17 23 26.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vanessa Webb Fang Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1992 1487 96.8 0.0% -4.00 +0.15
19 1995 1476 106.5 20.0% -2.20 0–1 -0.15 1992 1544 119.3 +55 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.13
20 1993 1529 112.6 +30 +31 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) -0.54
21 1994 1609 120.8 -10 +8 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90
22 1998 1464 104.9 0.0% -3.25 -0.08 1995 1623 122.6 -4 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 +0.34
23 1999 1450 96.7 0.0% -3.50 +0.31 1996 1592 112.9 +22 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31
24 2000 1447 99.4 +21 32.3% -1.10 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.5 +0.61 1997 1600 118.4 +20 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 +0.54
25 2001 1452 101.7 42.9% -0.43 0–1 +0.04 1998 1676 134.1 +38 -58 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15
26 2002 1458 111.9 +4 28.6% -0.86 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.26 1999 1586 117.9 +101 -16 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13
27 2003 1439 92.4 +7 30.0% -1.70 1–1 +0.48 2000 1542 89.1 20.0% -2.40 0–1 +0.39
28 2001 1500 92.6 +80 0.0% -4.50 0.00
Career 1500 103.1 +14 28.0% -1.40 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +3.33 1707 127.8 +28 -30 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.