H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Vanessa Webb vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 0-1
Noelle Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Vanessa Webb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Noelle Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Noelle Van Lottum won the 1992 Toronto second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 50
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1992 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Noelle Van Lottum | 6-2 6-2 | Vanessa Webb | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanessa Webb | #838 | #107 | 316 | 1,500 | 8 | 25 | 24.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noelle Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,659 | 56 | 96 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vanessa Webb | Noelle Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #459 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #116 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |