H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Vania King vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 0-1

Akgul Amanmuradova holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akgul Amanmuradova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Akgul Amanmuradova won the 2007 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Akgul Amanmuradova
Uzbekistan Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Akgul Amanmuradova #210 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 Vania King #74 Match data May 29, 2007* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,630 61 102 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vania King Akgul Amanmuradova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
18 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0
19 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,465 0 0
20 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0
21 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0
22 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,490 0 0
23 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,528 0 0
24 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1 2008 15–22 40.5% #82 1,525 0 0
25 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,539 0 0
26 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,579 0 0
27 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,492 0 0
28 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,455 0 0
29 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,483 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,482 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,489 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vania King Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2005 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
22 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 9 14 23 39.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — 46 67 113 40.7% 15 26 41 36.6% 0 9 9 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 237/288 of Vania King's and 129/151 of Akgul Amanmuradova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Vania King Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9% 2006 2/4 5.0 3.0 59.9% 63.9% 43.8% 38.8% 40.3% 56.9% 38.6%
23 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5% 2007 10/16 5.6 2.0 62.6% 66.8% 46.8% 60.7% 60.0% 59.2% 42.7%
24 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1% 2008 30/37 5.5 2.7 61.3% 65.6% 42.2% 60.2% 45.6% 56.6% 39.9%
25 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6% 2009 16/19 5.9 2.0 62.8% 66.7% 45.3% 56.1% 37.2% 58.6% 39.6%
26 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7% 2010 26/26 4.7 1.8 66.9% 64.3% 45.4% 50.3% 42.3% 58.0% 38.7%
27 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1% 2011 22/23 3.1 2.4 66.6% 59.1% 44.4% 39.9% 46.2% 54.0% 36.7%
28 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6% 2012 13/15 4.4 1.0 65.9% 59.9% 47.7% 48.7% 30.7% 56.1% 34.6%
29 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7% 2013 4/5 6.3 2.3 66.5% 62.7% 43.8% 59.2% 47.1% 57.4% 34.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 4/4 4.5 1.3 75.1% 66.8% 43.4% 64.6% 31.1% 60.7% 39.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 3.0 4.0 83.8% 38.7% 0.0% 33.3% — 32.4% 25.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 65.7% 32.1% 71.4% 0.0% 50.8% 28.6%
Career — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4% — 129/163 4.8 2.1 64.8% 63.6% 44.2% 52.8% 42.4% 56.8% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vania King Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14 2001 1482 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19
18 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23 2002 1472 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07
19 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09 2003 1465 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
20 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36 2004 1451 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
21 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43 2005 1507 105.0 — — — — +16 — — 63.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.89
22 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31 2006 1491 102.4 -0.77 -0.65 0.896 48.1% +3 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.12
23 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01 2007 1529 108.8 +0.69 -2.00 1.048 51.1% -9 — — 48.6% -0.28 2–3 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.9 +0.73
24 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53 2008 1525 120.6 +0.62 -3.54 0.919 48.6% +1 +77 — 42.2% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 99.4 +0.30
25 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14 2009 1539 105.7 +1.49 -2.51 0.958 49.4% +41 +3 — 44.2% -0.14 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 +1.76
26 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02 2010 1579 116.9 +1.35 -3.94 0.921 48.4% +27 -59 — 44.4% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.64
27 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71 2011 1493 104.0 -1.69 -5.44 0.799 45.4% +59 -23 — 33.3% -1.56 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.6 +0.71
28 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16 2012 1456 115.4 +0.74 -4.35 0.787 45.2% +39 +29 — 17.2% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.5 -0.79
29 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17 2013 1483 113.9 +0.82 -2.38 0.797 46.4% +27 — — 40.0% -0.40 — — — -0.31
30 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1482 99.1 +0.09 -1.61 1.015 49.9% +28 — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.75
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1502 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1490 91.4 -0.67 -2.70 0.370 29.0% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1465 97.4 -1.53 -4.65 0.581 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1466 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1434 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80 — 1631 113.1 +0.44 -3.64 0.887 47.7% +22 +13 — 39.5% -0.71 15–21 (42%) 22–23 (49%) 97.8 +3.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.