H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Vania King vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-0

Vania King holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Vania King leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2008 Indian Wells Open round of 128 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #119 4-6 6-3 6-4 Anne Kremer #106 Match data Mar 14, 2008* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Vania King #113 6-2 6-1 Anne Kremer #86 Match data Nov 1, 2007* R32 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vania King — #50 1,225 1,767 128 161 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anne Kremer — #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vania King Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2007 15–22 40.5% #109 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,520 0 1 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,592 0 1 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,598 0 1 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,692 0 1 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,618 0 1 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,518 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vania King Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 11 15 26 42.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 110 206 46.6% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — — — — — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 237/289 of Vania King's and 41/71 of Anne Kremer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Vania King Anne Kremer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 21/37 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7% 2005 5/18 2.4 1.6 69.3% 58.4% 35.9% 47.0% 58.1% 51.0% 43.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 5/12 0.8 3.0 62.0% 50.4% 41.6% 42.4% 30.3% 47.5% 42.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 12/20 1.3 2.7 70.8% 54.9% 43.4% 43.1% 45.8% 51.6% 42.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 9/10 1.0 3.8 62.2% 52.5% 39.7% 44.1% 42.5% 47.5% 42.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/4 0.7 4.7 60.9% 59.4% 32.9% 41.7% 30.0% 49.0% 36.5%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/7 1.7 2.6 66.0% 52.0% 38.2% 34.7% 59.6% 47.4% 38.2%
Career — 237/289 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4% — 41/333 1.3 3.0 66.1% 54.1% 39.8% 42.2% 45.6% 49.2% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vania King Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1629 118.6 -1.36 -3.67 0.818 45.8% +20 -161 +14 42.0% -0.72 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1521 117.8 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +52 -54 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.6 -1.10 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09
20 2009 1592 115.0 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +24 -123 -32 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +0.35 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12
21 2010 1599 118.2 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +26 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.40 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53
22 2011 1692 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -17 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65
23 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -45 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01 1999 1640 130.4 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 2013 1632 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% 0 -44 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +19 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14 2001 1696 135.0 — — — — +1 -56 +60 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58
28 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +8 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09
30 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 118.4 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -39 +123 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1461 103.4 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +17 +102 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.28
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1475 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1464 94.4 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +13 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.18
Career — 1768 128.1 -0.67 -0.73 0.935 48.6% +18 -80 -68 46.0% -0.32 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 103.9 -1.91 — 1810 132.3 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +2 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.