H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Vania King vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-1
Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2008 Amelia Island second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2008* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 6-3 | Vania King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vania King | Lindsay Davenport | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 |
| 22 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 |
| 23 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 |
| 24 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 |
| 25 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 |
| 26 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 |
| 27 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 |