H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Vania King vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 1-1

Vania King and Lourdes Domínguez Lino are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay, while Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2016 Miami Open first round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #183 6-4 6-4 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #114 Match data Mar 24, 2016* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #69 6-1 6-4 Vania King #81 Match data Apr 11, 2007* R64 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vania King Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vania King Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — — — — — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vania King Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.