H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vania King vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 1-0
Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Mariana Duque-Mariño in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vania King won the 2014 Bogota quarterfinal 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2014* | Bogota | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Vania King | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vania King | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |