H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Vania King vs Natela Dzalamidze.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | 7-5 6-3 | Natela Dzalamidze | Match data | Apr 24, 2016 | Q2 | Prague Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,767 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Natela Dzalamidze | — | — | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vania King | Natela Dzalamidze | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Vania King | Natela Dzalamidze | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2005 | 1520 | 103.7 | -0.64 | +0.14 | 0.625 | 40.2% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 1663 | 131.1 | -1.06 | -0.47 | 0.997 | 50.5% | +24 | — | — | 55.0% | +0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.5 | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 1625 | 116.9 | -1.39 | -3.73 | 0.818 | 45.8% | +17 | -157 | +16 | 43.0% | -0.67 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.4 | -1.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 1519 | 117.6 | +0.05 | -3.22 | 0.890 | 47.7% | +49 | -52 | — | 33.9% | -0.89 | 5–7 (42%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.7 | -1.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 1592 | 114.9 | -1.54 | -1.39 | 0.910 | 48.1% | +21 | -123 | -33 | 44.9% | -0.45 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.9 | +0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 1598 | 117.8 | -1.20 | +0.84 | 0.997 | 49.8% | +24 | -97 | -78 | 49.3% | -0.17 | 4–9 (31%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.1 | +0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 1691 | 130.5 | -1.09 | +0.98 | 0.960 | 48.9% | -18 | -128 | — | 48.4% | -0.17 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.8 | -1.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 1618 | 128.3 | +0.93 | +0.08 | 1.011 | 50.1% | +21 | -46 | — | 48.0% | -0.05 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | 99.5 | -1.01 | 2016 | 1474 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 1631 | 118.3 | -0.91 | -1.79 | 0.887 | 47.5% | +1 | -43 | — | 41.7% | -0.79 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–3 (50%) | 103.1 | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 1650 | 125.5 | -1.58 | -0.66 | 0.932 | 48.6% | +18 | -55 | -202 | 49.2% | -0.07 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–2 (60%) | 105.8 | -1.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 1635 | 102.3 | +0.69 | -0.52 | 0.746 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 2019 | 1476 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 1646 | 125.1 | +0.57 | +0.85 | 1.016 | 50.3% | +12 | -20 | — | 53.7% | +0.11 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | 102.4 | +0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 1593 | 108.4 | -1.97 | -0.89 | 0.750 | 44.4% | +4 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 1560 | 104.4 | -2.66 | -1.04 | 0.768 | 44.2% | +6 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 1541 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1767 | 127.9 | -0.67 | -0.74 | 0.935 | 48.6% | +17 | -80 | -68 | 46.2% | -0.31 | 46–50 (48%) | 34–30 (53%) | 104.0 | -1.80 | — | 1500 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Feb 11, 2012 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 20, 2012 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 9, 2012 | H2H |
| Ana Ivanovic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 21, 2012 | H2H |
No career rivalry data available.