H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Vania King vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0

Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2011 Australian Open round of 128 6-7(4) 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #88 6-7(4) 6-0 6-3 Tamira Paszek Match data Jan 19, 2011* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vania King Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vania King Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — — — — — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 237/288 of Vania King's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Vania King Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3% 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1% 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7% 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vania King Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.