H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 22:32 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Varvara Lepchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2013 Charleston fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 5, 2013* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Venus Williams #24 6-2 4-6 6-2 Varvara Lepchenko #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,544 0 0 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47